
One of the presentations in class concerned how to implement backward design when creating a curriculum. The concept is to start the design process with the end in mind or as Stephen R. Covey puts it in his book,
The Seven Habit of Highly Effective People, "To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you're going so that you better understand where you are now so that the steps you take are always in the right direction." I've heard a similar concept discussed when people talk about how to consider the type of life you should live. They say that by thinking about what you want said on your tombstone or obit, you can determine the types of actions you can take today.
Doing some reading beyond class, I discovered there are three questions that need to be asked in a backwards design: 1. What is worthy and requiring of understanding? 2. What is evidence of that understanding? and 3. What learning experiences and teaching promote understanding, interest and excellence in the subject?
So the first step is to focus on the learning goals. These are the "enduring understandings" teachers use to form the first questions in backward design. These are the "big picture" questions that consider concepts and principles. They should move beyond the walls of the school into real life and typically engage the "doing" of the subject. These type of understandings engage the students.
In order for learners to express their understanding and for instructors to recognize the understanding, the learners should be able to explain, interpret, apply, empathize, and have perspective and self-knowledge. This second step is where b.d. is different from traditional design. Instead of thinking of questions for the test or quiz, b.d. asks how will I know when they understand? - when they can explain, interpret, apply, etc. It's much less important what questions are being asked than whether the content being taught is understood. Because the emphasis is on understanding, instructors can focus on the different levels of understanding instead of correct or incorrect answers.
Finally, in the third stage, instructors design lessons and experiences that help learners gain understanding through inquiry, arguments, applications and points of view that lay beneath the facts and opinions concerning the subject. These learning experiences should require students to theorize, interpret, use or see from a perspective regarding what they are asked to learn. This process is an inquiry-based approach and provides what I believe are "opportunities for discovery" for the learner.
This is such an amazing way of constructing a class, I think I'm going to try it on the basic photography curriculum for next semester.
(concepts and some language come from Understanding by Design, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe, 2001, Prentice Hall Inc)